Skip to Content
也许Olympus自己都对4/3系统的前景不太有信心吧,如今的数码相机像素密度越做越大,愈发暴露出小片幅感光元件的先天不足,在这点上4/3系统是怎么也拼不过APS-C和FF的,而消费者的心理永远是买大不买小的,可怜的4/3阵营只能以4/3系统就是全幅来自我安慰。另外我觉得Olympus当初选错了搭档,Panasonic的单反历来走的是小众路线,规格很好,但价格更好,对于4/3系统的推广并没有起到很好的正面作用。如果当初能够把财大气粗的$ony拉拢过来的话,现在的境况会不会有很大的改善呢?至于M4/3系统,我觉得纯粹是要去抢占消费机市场的产物了,可换镜头的大片幅消费机,比上不足,比下有余,如果做得成功的话,也许还有点看头。
Name
E-mail
E-mail:
Password
Remember Me
E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment
Add your comments:
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments. And yes, comments are moderated.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
dodge @ Apr 5th 2009 11:37PM
也许Olympus自己都对4/3系统的前景不太有信心吧,如今的数码相机像素密度越做越大,愈发暴露出小片幅感光元件的先天不足,在这点上4/3系统是怎么也拼不过APS-C和FF的,而消费者的心理永远是买大不买小的,可怜的4/3阵营只能以4/3系统就是全幅来自我安慰。
另外我觉得Olympus当初选错了搭档,Panasonic的单反历来走的是小众路线,规格很好,但价格更好,对于4/3系统的推广并没有起到很好的正面作用。如果当初能够把财大气粗的$ony拉拢过来的话,现在的境况会不会有很大的改善呢?
至于M4/3系统,我觉得纯粹是要去抢占消费机市场的产物了,可换镜头的大片幅消费机,比上不足,比下有余,如果做得成功的话,也许还有点看头。