Skip to Content
在中国就不一样了宁愿牺牲三个宇航员也不能弃船
胡扯~宇航员要比设备贵多了~~政府才不会算不过这个帐来~~
楼上, 对你的结论深表怀疑..... ioi
发生了才知道一不一样!
不知道这个论点从何而来。美国是太空探测史上搭上人命最多的国家,挑战者事件之后又出现哥伦比亚的事故,你能说美国不重视宇航员的性命么?还是讲证据吧。单纯泄愤就没意思了
那你知不知道中国有多少飞行员为了“保飞机”而丧命吗?然后官方在组织殉职者家属四处开会做报告,鼓励更多的飞行员“保飞机”!!!
我是说Pulsar 的。。。
Name
E-mail
E-mail:
Password
Remember Me
E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment
Add your comments:
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments. And yes, comments are moderated.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
alan_qiu @ Mar 13th 2009 11:22AM
在中国就不一样了
宁愿牺牲三个宇航员也不能弃船
xiao2.cn @ Mar 13th 2009 11:57AM
胡扯~宇航员要比设备贵多了~~政府才不会算不过这个帐来~~
chancekang @ Mar 13th 2009 12:09PM
楼上, 对你的结论深表怀疑..... ioi
embont @ Mar 13th 2009 9:12PM
发生了才知道一不一样!
Pulsar @ Mar 15th 2009 10:29AM
不知道这个论点从何而来。
美国是太空探测史上搭上人命最多的国家,挑战者事件之后又出现哥伦比亚的事故,你能说美国不重视宇航员的性命么?
还是讲证据吧。单纯泄愤就没意思了
abc @ Mar 15th 2009 9:43PM
那你知不知道中国有多少飞行员为了“保飞机”而丧命吗?然后官方在组织殉职者家属四处开会做报告,鼓励更多的飞行员“保飞机”!!!
abc @ Mar 15th 2009 9:43PM
我是说Pulsar 的。。。