Skip to Content
这样做等于是水果版的MID而已,英特尔推广了这么久都没有起色,水果确定能行?netbook的优势是延续了X86架构,能够采用WIN操作系统,软件品质上有着巨大优势,而且有笔记本键盘(好吧,我承认,现在全触控很火),在这点上ARM架构仍然有不可逾越的鸿沟。更大的劣势是,现在的MAC OS仍然不支持真正意义上的多任务应用,在掌上设备中这点尚可忍受的,但你能想象NET BOOK级别的设备不支持多任务吗?水果如果想靠这玩意入侵NET BOOK市场,除非大改系统或者干脆引入X86架构,否则只会有北美那些狂热的果粉买账。我现在用诺基亚的N810,暂时找不到理由换成这种“大脸版”IPOD TOUCH,当然APP STORE也许是个理由。
电池续航能力,像IPHONE一样不也能够换电池的话,实用性就降到0了,还有播放格式的支持也是关键,我可不想买个到时RMVB还不能放,OSX支持的功能还是少数,所以,苹果,开源吧!
Name
E-mail
E-mail:
Password
Remember Me
E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment
Add your comments:
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments. And yes, comments are moderated.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Slar @ Dec 31st 2008 9:56AM
这样做等于是水果版的MID而已,英特尔推广了这么久都没有起色,水果确定能行?netbook的优势是延续了X86架构,能够采用WIN操作系统,软件品质上有着巨大优势,而且有笔记本键盘(好吧,我承认,现在全触控很火),在这点上ARM架构仍然有不可逾越的鸿沟。更大的劣势是,现在的MAC OS仍然不支持真正意义上的多任务应用,在掌上设备中这点尚可忍受的,但你能想象NET BOOK级别的设备不支持多任务吗?水果如果想靠这玩意入侵NET BOOK市场,除非大改系统或者干脆引入X86架构,否则只会有北美那些狂热的果粉买账。我现在用诺基亚的N810,暂时找不到理由换成这种“大脸版”IPOD TOUCH,当然APP STORE也许是个理由。
U @ Dec 31st 2008 10:13AM
电池续航能力,像IPHONE一样不也能够换电池的话,实用性就降到0了,还有播放格式的支持也是关键,我可不想买个到时RMVB还不能放,OSX支持的功能还是少数,所以,苹果,开源吧!