http://cn.engadget.com/2008/08/19/athlon-64-2000-at-8-watts-outperforms-draws-less-energy-than-a/ Engadget 中国版 Comments for 速龙与原子PK耗电量，胜者是... http://cn.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://cn.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://cn.engadget.com/2008/08/19/athlon-64-2000-at-8-watts-outperforms-draws-less-energy-than-a/http://cn.engadget.com/2008/08/19/athlon-64-2000-at-8-watts-outperforms-draws-less-energy-than-a/只限成绩方面]]>Aug 19th 2008 2:09AMhttp://cn.engadget.com/2008/08/19/athlon-64-2000-at-8-watts-outperforms-draws-less-energy-than-a/http://cn.engadget.com/2008/08/19/athlon-64-2000-at-8-watts-outperforms-draws-less-energy-than-a/Aug 19th 2008 2:21AMhttp://cn.engadget.com/2008/08/19/athlon-64-2000-at-8-watts-outperforms-draws-less-energy-than-a/http://cn.engadget.com/2008/08/19/athlon-64-2000-at-8-watts-outperforms-draws-less-energy-than-a/不是说Atom配搭的芯片组没有出来，导致现有芯片组功耗很高的嘛？
不知道出来后又如何呢？]]>Aug 19th 2008 2:22AMhttp://cn.engadget.com/2008/08/19/athlon-64-2000-at-8-watts-outperforms-draws-less-energy-than-a/http://cn.engadget.com/2008/08/19/athlon-64-2000-at-8-watts-outperforms-draws-less-energy-than-a/Aug 19th 2008 2:24AMhttp://cn.engadget.com/2008/08/19/athlon-64-2000-at-8-watts-outperforms-draws-less-energy-than-a/http://cn.engadget.com/2008/08/19/athlon-64-2000-at-8-watts-outperforms-draws-less-energy-than-a/Aug 19th 2008 2:43AMhttp://cn.engadget.com/2008/08/19/athlon-64-2000-at-8-watts-outperforms-draws-less-energy-than-a/http://cn.engadget.com/2008/08/19/athlon-64-2000-at-8-watts-outperforms-draws-less-energy-than-a/Aug 19th 2008 3:39AMhttp://cn.engadget.com/2008/08/19/athlon-64-2000-at-8-watts-outperforms-draws-less-energy-than-a/http://cn.engadget.com/2008/08/19/athlon-64-2000-at-8-watts-outperforms-draws-less-energy-than-a/]]>Aug 19th 2008 3:51AMhttp://cn.engadget.com/2008/08/19/athlon-64-2000-at-8-watts-outperforms-draws-less-energy-than-a/http://cn.engadget.com/2008/08/19/athlon-64-2000-at-8-watts-outperforms-draws-less-energy-than-a/945GM TDP 7W, Poulsbo 2.3W，你再比比看？
]]>Aug 19th 2008 5:23AMhttp://cn.engadget.com/2008/08/19/athlon-64-2000-at-8-watts-outperforms-draws-less-energy-than-a/http://cn.engadget.com/2008/08/19/athlon-64-2000-at-8-watts-outperforms-draws-less-energy-than-a/Aug 19th 2008 11:27AMhttp://cn.engadget.com/2008/08/19/athlon-64-2000-at-8-watts-outperforms-draws-less-energy-than-a/http://cn.engadget.com/2008/08/19/athlon-64-2000-at-8-watts-outperforms-draws-less-energy-than-a/Aug 19th 2008 11:28AMhttp://cn.engadget.com/2008/08/19/athlon-64-2000-at-8-watts-outperforms-draws-less-energy-than-a/http://cn.engadget.com/2008/08/19/athlon-64-2000-at-8-watts-outperforms-draws-less-energy-than-a/Aug 19th 2008 9:38PMhttp://cn.engadget.com/2008/08/19/athlon-64-2000-at-8-watts-outperforms-draws-less-energy-than-a/http://cn.engadget.com/2008/08/19/athlon-64-2000-at-8-watts-outperforms-draws-less-energy-than-a/
这两款的功耗怎么可能在同一水平上]]>Aug 19th 2008 11:25PMhttp://cn.engadget.com/2008/08/19/athlon-64-2000-at-8-watts-outperforms-draws-less-energy-than-a/http://cn.engadget.com/2008/08/19/athlon-64-2000-at-8-watts-outperforms-draws-less-energy-than-a/TOM这么测起码看起来是没有任何问题的.
Atom目前本来就很噱头.故意搭配一点也不节能的945出库存忽悠消费者...靠..
其实算下来一点也没有特别省电.除非Atom出更合适的芯片组搭配！
Atom的能耗性能比还不如780G搭配任意低端AMD cpu....这是多么的搞笑啊...]]>Aug 20th 2008 8:10PM