Skip to Content
超无聊,史特林引擎不够热是动不了的,也就是说芯片组要足够热才能驱动它,而且转速及其有限。不知道增加这个玩意的成本与节约下来的风扇电费相比,还有芯片组节能化(别那么高能耗高热)相比,那个比较有意义些……或者这么比较吧,芯片组驱动它所需的热量能耗,与装传统风扇散热器(相同散热效率)的能耗相比哪个多?这不论成本了。反正到时候上市肯定是噱头,又是很贵的一笔。
Name
E-mail
E-mail:
Password
Remember Me
E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment
Add your comments:
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments. And yes, comments are moderated.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
四季寶 @ Mar 3rd 2008 2:26AM
超无聊,史特林引擎不够热是动不了的,也就是说芯片组要足够热才能驱动它,而且转速及其有限。
不知道增加这个玩意的成本与节约下来的风扇电费相比,还有芯片组节能化(别那么高能耗高热)相比,那个比较有意义些……
或者这么比较吧,芯片组驱动它所需的热量能耗,与装传统风扇散热器(相同散热效率)的能耗相比哪个多?这不论成本了。反正到时候上市肯定是噱头,又是很贵的一笔。