Skip to Content
评测文章有像是置入性广告文章,的确不只有一位读者反应。不过站在我们的立场来说,并未有如此的做法,编辑这边是完全独立作业,我也管不到广告业务,而广告业务也管不到我这边,我这边就实际的意义而言,是不可能有所谓的「广告文」。但正如读者Treasure兄所言「瘾科技的立场为什么会被读者认为文章像广告?」,这是我们编辑所需要深思的。----------------------------------------------------以上是您的原话,还有一点我需要您的解释:为什么最近两篇关于三星产品的文章在 rss 阅读器上是全文输出,而其他的产品却是“跳转后看更多内容”?这也算是中立吗?
Name
E-mail
E-mail:
Password
Remember Me
E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment
Add your comments:
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments. And yes, comments are moderated.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
ab0529 @ Feb 15th 2008 10:15PM
评测文章有像是置入性广告文章,的确不只有一位读者反应。不过站在我们的立场来说,并未有如此的做法,编辑这边是完全独立作业,我也管不到广告业务,而广告业务也管不到我这边,我这边就实际的意义而言,是不可能有所谓的「广告文」。但正如读者Treasure兄所言「瘾科技的立场为什么会被读者认为文章像广告?」,这是我们编辑所需要深思的。
----------------------------------------------------
以上是您的原话,还有一点我需要您的解释:为什么最近两篇关于三星产品的文章在 rss 阅读器上是全文输出,而其他的产品却是“跳转后看更多内容”?
这也算是中立吗?