Skip to Content
对于此类相关知识产权纠纷的案例,当事人对于知识产权的被侵犯可以在证据成立的前提下向法院申请调查审理期间的保护性禁制令。也就是新闻中当事人因为诉各大硬盘厂商侵犯其“没有同意这个技术可以在美国境外使用”于是可以要求法院在美国境内以对该些厂商的相关产品采取"保护性禁制令"禁止其产品竟如美国境内以惩罚同时起到在审查期间保护当事人利益。一般此类案件最后都以达成和解结束。如现在比较火的高通芯片的问题。
Name
E-mail
E-mail:
Password
Remember Me
E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment
Add your comments:
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments. And yes, comments are moderated.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
AEVID @ Oct 15th 2007 2:25AM
对于此类相关知识产权纠纷的案例,当事人对于知识产权的被侵犯可以在证据成立的前提下向法院申请调查审理期间的保护性禁制令。也就是新闻中当事人因为诉各大硬盘厂商侵犯其“没有同意这个技术可以在美国境外使用”于是可以要求法院在美国境内以对该些厂商的相关产品采取"保护性禁制令"禁止其产品竟如美国境内以惩罚同时起到在审查期间保护当事人利益。一般此类案件最后都以达成和解结束。如现在比较火的高通芯片的问题。