Skip to Content
主站的报道也好像很模糊似的。反正Google过之后,据我总结,这专利纠纷的原因在于,那两个加州人拥有这技术的专利,而那几个硬盘厂商仅就“在美国国内生产硬盘”获得他们的授权,而相同的专利技术却在没有授权的情况下被这些厂商用于国外的生产厂。而问题在于他们也没有在国外申请此专利,所以与其因不能对国外产的硬盘征专利费而白瞪眼,不如申请禁止这些硬盘进口。西数、希捷应该在美国也有生产基地的,不过产能肯定不足;戴尔也生产硬盘?这个就不知道了。
Name
E-mail
E-mail:
Password
Remember Me
E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment
Add your comments:
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments. And yes, comments are moderated.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
hzhbest @ Oct 15th 2007 1:12AM
主站的报道也好像很模糊似的。
反正Google过之后,据我总结,这专利纠纷的原因在于,那两个加州人拥有这技术的专利,而那几个硬盘厂商仅就“在美国国内生产硬盘”获得他们的授权,而相同的专利技术却在没有授权的情况下被这些厂商用于国外的生产厂。而问题在于他们也没有在国外申请此专利,所以与其因不能对国外产的硬盘征专利费而白瞪眼,不如申请禁止这些硬盘进口。
西数、希捷应该在美国也有生产基地的,不过产能肯定不足;戴尔也生产硬盘?这个就不知道了。