<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget &#20013;&#22269;&#29256; - Comments for é£åçµåçè½æºå¨å­è£ç½</title>
<link>http://cn.engadget.com/2007/10/07/excess-wind-energy-to-be-stored-underground-for-future-use/</link>
<description>Engadget &#20013;&#22269;&#29256; Comments for é£åçµåçè½æºå¨å­è£ç½</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on é£åçµåçè½æºå¨å­è£ç½]]></title><link>http://cn.engadget.com/2007/10/07/excess-wind-energy-to-be-stored-underground-for-future-use/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://cn.engadget.com/2007/10/07/excess-wind-energy-to-be-stored-underground-for-future-use/</guid><description><![CDATA[理解不能中…………]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[admidi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 7th 2007 4:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on é£åçµåçè½æºå¨å­è£ç½]]></title><link>http://cn.engadget.com/2007/10/07/excess-wind-energy-to-be-stored-underground-for-future-use/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://cn.engadget.com/2007/10/07/excess-wind-energy-to-be-stored-underground-for-future-use/</guid><description><![CDATA[都快能储存灵魂了.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Satan_L5]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 7th 2007 4:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on é£åçµåçè½æºå¨å­è£ç½]]></title><link>http://cn.engadget.com/2007/10/07/excess-wind-energy-to-be-stored-underground-for-future-use/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://cn.engadget.com/2007/10/07/excess-wind-energy-to-be-stored-underground-for-future-use/</guid><description><![CDATA[风力发电场发出的能量很不稳定，如果直接并网，可能会给电网带来冲击，尤其是大规模的系统，所以需要一个缓冲装置，就好像这个大气罐。实际上地下是一个天然的大溶洞之类，不要花多少钱建设。<br>问题是：风场对地点有要求，溶洞的选择也有要求，所以这可算是黑白配了，不容易啊。<br>个人觉得核聚变才是能源的出路，不知道合肥的east项目能担当起多少]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jarod]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 7th 2007 7:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on é£åçµåçè½æºå¨å­è£ç½]]></title><link>http://cn.engadget.com/2007/10/07/excess-wind-energy-to-be-stored-underground-for-future-use/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://cn.engadget.com/2007/10/07/excess-wind-energy-to-be-stored-underground-for-future-use/</guid><description><![CDATA[风力发电当然不能直接并上去…………<br>你见过哪地方风力发电是直接并上去的？？<br><br>PS:<br>我这省一个核电厂一个地热电厂…………如果我没记错的话。]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[admidi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 7th 2007 7:31AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on é£åçµåçè½æºå¨å­è£ç½]]></title><link>http://cn.engadget.com/2007/10/07/excess-wind-energy-to-be-stored-underground-for-future-use/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://cn.engadget.com/2007/10/07/excess-wind-energy-to-be-stored-underground-for-future-use/</guid><description><![CDATA[这创意好在空气到处都有，于是选址不成问题（耐不了建空气压缩缸）。不过我觉得，现在比较成熟的蓄能技术是抽水蓄能（既然能驱动空气压缩机，驱动抽水机有什么区别呢），更好的方向是能直接电解出燃料电池的燃料，要么用来像汽油似的卖出去，要么用来发电接入电网（抽水蓄能效率也就55%，燃料电池只要高于这个就有前途）。<br>压缩空气，总觉得会爆炸……想想怎么液化不是更好吗？]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[hzhbest]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 7th 2007 10:38PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>